Site icon Pro Legal Care LLC

Can a Judge Be Removed from a Case?

photo of a female judge holding a gavel from the Pro Legal Care LLC blog post titled Can a judge be removed from a case?

The legal process is designed to allow you to receive an unbiased judicial process in the case, and being stuck with an unfair judge can erode public trust and the integrity of the justice system. One of the most common questions that lawyers get is, “Can a judge be removed from a case?” The answer depends on the relationships and the context of your specific case. If you are asking yourself if you can remove the judge from your divorce case, chances are you are in trouble and need professional legal assistance.


Quick Answers

Reasons for Removing a Judge “as a Matter of Right”

The easiest and most common way to remove your divorce judge is the process called, “as a matter of right.” Lawyers generally refer to remedies that are available “as a matter of right” when the remedy is available to all parties under certain circumstances. In other words, no special facts have to be proven in order for the remedy to be exercised. Consequently, every person who is a party to a divorce or family case has the right to substitute or remove their judge pursuant to the laws of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure. Although every party is generally entitled to one opportunity to change judges, it is subject to two specific parameters.

As stated, each party is entitled to only one substitution or removal of judges as a matter of right, so the first requirement is that the requesting party has not previously requested a substitution of judges as a matter of right in the case. Second, the request must be brought before the court and made before any substantive decision is made in the case. This means that your right to substitution of judges is foreclosed when a substantive decision is made in the case. If your request for substitution of judges as a matter of right is your first request and is heard before any substantive decision is made, it will be granted.

A “substantive decision” is a decision that goes to the merits of the case. Continuance orders or scheduling order would generally not qualify as “substantive decisions.”

Reasons for Removing a Judge “For Cause”

A fair and impartial judge is important in divorce and family law cases, which often involve deeply personal matters involving your livelihood and your children. In a child custody or divorce case, the judge presiding over the case must be impartial and fair. However, there are instances where a judge may need to be removed. There are a variety of ways that a judge can be removed from a particular case. Understanding these reasons will empower you to recognize when a judge’s removal is warranted and take the necessary steps to ensure a fair hearing.

Actual Bias that Makes the Judge’s Impartiality Impossible

Bias refers to a situation where the judge’s personal beliefs or opinions may unfairly influence their decisions in a case. For instance, a judge may have a pre-existing relationship with one of the parties that could compromise their impartiality. For example, the judge being a party to the litigation or having a major vested interest in the outcome of the case can be a basis for the removal of the judge form the case. It is a high legal burden to prove the necessary elements required to remove the judge, as minor relationships or tangential connections to the case are insufficient to have the judge removed.

The way that the judge has treated you in court is almost always unpersuasive and irrelevant to your argument, especially if your reasoning is that the judge always finds in favor of your opposing party or that the judge does not properly apply the law in your case. Judges are often required to pick the side of one party or the other, and this means that the judge develops opinions of the parties that are sometimes negative. This is not evidence of bias. Additionally, the judge being aware of information or allegations due to the judge presiding in a different case that you are involved in, likewise, does not provide any evidence of bias.

Conflict of Interest that Makes the Judge Unable to Fairly Preside

Conflicts of interest arises when a judge has a significant personal or financial connection that renders the judge unable to fairly preside over the case. When a judge has a personal or political interest in the case that removes their ability to be impartial, there exists a conflict of interest and a basis to remove the judge for cause.

The conflict must be severe enough to influence the judge’s views and impede the judge’s capacity to render impartial decisions. When a conflict of interest exists, it may be necessary to assign a substitute judge to guarantee a fair hearing for the party seeking substitution. “Substituting” a judge is another way to describe the removal and replacement of the judge in a specific case.

Inappropriate Conduct

Inappropriate conduct exhibited by the judge is generally insufficient to warrant the removal of the judge from the case. The nature of the conduct exhibited by a judge in court would have to be egregious and extreme in order for it to be used as a basis to remove the judge. For example, the use of a racial slur directed to one of the parties of a particular race could serve as grounds to remove the judge from the case, or if the judge openly stated that the decision was made due to the skin color of one of the parties.

Outside of such extreme and egregious examples of inappropriate behavior, the conduct of a judge must be illegal or criminal to warrant the judge’s removal from the case. Even in cases where the judge’s conduct is illegal or criminal, there still must be a showing that the conduct makes it impossible for the judge to preside fairly and impartially over the case. The judge taking a bribe from one of the parties is an example of the type of conduct that could warrant the judge’s removal.

Steps to Request a Judge’s Removal

Filing a Motion to Remove a Judge

It is important for you to act early in the process, if you believe that your assigned judge should be removed due to actual bias, conflict of interest, or other conduct that renders the judge unable to preside over the case in a fair and impartial manner. The steps to request a judge’s removal involve gathering evidence, filing a motion with the court, and attending a hearing to present your case. Use a formal and professional tone in the language of your motion, explicitly detail the grounds for requesting the judge’s removal, and include the pertinent legal statutes that support the judge’s removal. This will help to objectively demonstrate that the requisite grounds for disqualification are present, supporting your case for the judge’s removal. Adhering to the appropriate procedures and requirements for filing a motion enhances your chances of removing a biased or inappropriate judge from your case.

Attending a Hearing

The final step in requesting a judge’s removal is attending a hearing before a different judge to present your case and argue for the removal of the original judge for cause. During the hearing, you must focus on the evidence and arguments that support your claim. This means that the judge’s conduct in court is largely irrelevant. You are not likely to be taken seriously if your argument is based on the way that the judge has treated you in court.

Appealing the Decision

If the judge’s removal is denied, you may need to appeal the decision to a higher court. The process of appealing a judge’s decision generally entails submitting a Notice of Appeal, paying the filing fee, supplying supplemental information if necessary, and having the appeal assessed by a higher court.

The grounds for appealing a judge’s decision may include errors of law or that the decision of the Trial Court was against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appealing a decision can be a complex and time-consuming process, often taking several months to years depending on the complexity of the issues involved.

Tips for Dealing with a Difficult Judge

When handling a difficult judge, it can tough to maintain composure and proper decorum. In all interactions with the judge, it is crucial to maintain a professional and respectful demeanor. Focus on the facts, avoid emotional arguments, and refrain from personal attacks. This might be even more important if you believe the judge is bias in favor of the opposing party. Exercising intellectual honesty, showing good judgment, and exhibiting humility when articulating your disagreement is essential. This will help you demonstrate your respect for the court and your commitment to a fair and impartial hearing. Managing your emotions, maintaining professionalism, and focusing on the facts of your case are also all important for the success of your case.

Summary

In conclusion, a biased judge can lead to unjust treatment, unequal implementation of the law, and a lack impartiality that can causes unjust outcomes. Dealing with a biased or inappropriate judge in a family law case can be a daunting. However, Illinois law allows for the substitution of judges “as a matter of right” if you act quickly. If your only option is to request a substitution of judges “for cause,” you have the right to take action to ensure a fair and impartial hearing. Remember to stay professional, focus on the facts, and seek legal support to increase the likelihood that your argument will succeed and that you will prevail in your claim.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why would a judge be removed from a case?

Either party may request that the judge be removed from their case, which is likely to be granted if this is the party’s first request to remove the judge and no decision on the merits has been made yet by the judge. Otherwise, the judge may be removed from a case if their exists a conflict of interest that causes the judge to be unable to be impartial, if there is real extra-judicial bias, or if the judge engages in illegal conduct. The judge not following the law does not constitute “illegal conduct.”

Who has the power to remove a judge?

Requests for the removal of a judge for cause are generally not heard by the judge that is being sought to be removed. Rather, the judge presiding in the case reassigns the case to another judge for the limited issue of the request to remove the presiding judge for cause, who makes an assessment of the evidence and law in relation to the bias alleged. This may include the initial judge’s own testimony. If the request for the judge’s removal is denied by the Trial Court, an appellate attorney can guide you on how to appeal the decision to a higher court, such as the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court.

What constitutes a conflict of interest for a judge?

A conflict of interest for a judge exists when the judge previously represented a party in the case, a party to the case is a direct family member, or the judge has a major and personal financial interest in the outcome of the case. The judge should be removed in such instances, to assure fair and impartial treatment for the parties and to avoid undermining public confidence in the judicial system.

How can I prove that a judge is biased in my case?

Gathering evidence of the judge’s personal beliefs or opinions is not sufficient to prove bias in your case, nor is proof that you were treated unfairly during the course of the case. The judge treating you differently or unfairly compared to the way the judge treats the other party is also not adequate to show bias. The evidence of bias must be direct and egregious in order for the judge to be removed for cause. The judge accepting a bribe is an example of illegal conduct for which the judge can be removed from your case.

Schedule a Consultation with Attorney Zachary Townsend

Call or text today – (815) 200-8802

During your consultation, Attorney Townsend will go over the history of your legal matter, ascertain your goals, and help you develop a new path forward for you and your family.
Exit mobile version